linux-kernel - [ 72/80] Bluetooth: Add missing lock nesting notation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130109201509.642066887@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  9 Jan 2013 12:36:04 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: [ 72/80] Bluetooth: Add missing lock nesting notation

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>

commit dc2a0e20fbc85a71c63aa4330b496fda33f6bf80 upstream.

This patch fixes the following report, it happens when accepting rfcomm
connections:

[  228.165378] =============================================
[  228.165378] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  228.165378] 3.7.0-rc1-00536-gc1d5dc4 #120 Tainted: G        W
[  228.165378] ---------------------------------------------
[  228.165378] bluetoothd/1341 is trying to acquire lock:
[  228.165378]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa0000aa0>] bt_accept_dequeue+0xa0/0x180 [bluetooth]
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378] but task is already holding lock:
[  228.165378]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa0205118>] rfcomm_sock_accept+0x58/0x2d0 [rfcomm]
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378] other info that might help us debug this:
[  228.165378]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]        CPU0
[  228.165378]        ----
[  228.165378]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
[  228.165378]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct soc
 	long timeo;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	lock_sock(sk);
+	lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 
 	if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct soc
 
 		release_sock(sk);
 		timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
-		lock_sock(sk);
+		lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 	}
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 	remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/