[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130109201505.093611557@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:34:50 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@...il.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: [ 051/123] pnfs: Increase the refcount when LAYOUTGET fails the first time
3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@...il.com>
commit 39e88fcfb1d5c6c4b1ff76ca2ab76cf449b850e8 upstream.
The layout will be set unusable if LAYOUTGET fails. Is it reasonable to
increase the refcount iff LAYOUTGET fails the first time?
Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void
pnfs_layout_set_fail_bit(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, int fail_bit)
{
lo->plh_retry_timestamp = jiffies;
- if (test_and_set_bit(fail_bit, &lo->plh_flags))
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(fail_bit, &lo->plh_flags))
atomic_inc(&lo->plh_refcount);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists