[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130109201506.580134532@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:35:40 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>
Subject: [ 48/80] xhci: Fix conditional check in bandwidth calculation.
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
commit 392a07ae3316f2b90b39ce41e66d6f6b5c95de90 upstream.
David reports that at drivers/usb/host/xhci.c:2257:
static bool xhci_is_sync_in_ep(unsigned int ep_type)
{
return (ep_type == ISOC_IN_EP || ep_type != INT_IN_EP);
}
The static analyser cppcheck says
[linux-3.7-rc2/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c:2257]: (style) Redundant condition: If ep_type == 5, the comparison ep_type != 7 is always true.
Maybe the original programmer intention was something like
static bool xhci_is_sync_in_ep(unsigned int ep_type)
{
return (ep_type == ISOC_IN_EP || ep_type == INT_IN_EP);
}
Fix this.
This patch should be backported to stable kernels as old as 3.2, that
contain the commit 2b69899934c63b7b9432568584fb4c4a2924f40c "xhci: USB
3.0 BW checking."
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static bool xhci_is_async_ep(unsigned in
static bool xhci_is_sync_in_ep(unsigned int ep_type)
{
- return (ep_type == ISOC_IN_EP || ep_type != INT_IN_EP);
+ return (ep_type == ISOC_IN_EP || ep_type == INT_IN_EP);
}
static unsigned int xhci_get_ss_bw_consumed(struct xhci_bw_info *ep_bw)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists