[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130109134816.db51a820.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:48:16 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@...on.hr>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: wait for congestion to clear on all zones
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:41:48 +0100
Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@...on.hr> wrote:
> Currently we take a short nap (HZ/10) and wait for congestion to clear
> before taking another pass with lower priority in balance_pgdat(). But
> we do that only for the highest zone that we encounter is unbalanced
> and congested.
>
> This patch changes that to wait on all congested zones in a single
> pass in the hope that it will save us some scanning that way. Also we
> take a nap as soon as congested zone is encountered and sc.priority <
> DEF_PRIORITY - 2 (aka kswapd in trouble).
>
> ...
>
> The patch is against the mm tree. Make sure that
> mm-avoid-calling-pgdat_balanced-needlessly.patch is applied first (not
> yet in the mmotm tree). Tested on half a dozen systems with different
> workloads for the last few days, working really well!
But what are the user-observable effcets of this change? Less kernel
CPU consumption, presumably? Did you quantify it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists