linux-kernel - [ 25/47] genirq: Always force thread affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130109201732.408321702@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  9 Jan 2013 12:35:20 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [ 25/47] genirq: Always force thread affinity

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

commit 04aa530ec04f61875b99c12721162e2964e3318c upstream.

Sankara reported that the genirq core code fails to adjust the
affinity of an interrupt thread in several cases:

 1) On request/setup_irq() the call to setup_affinity() happens before
    the new action is registered, so the new thread is not notified.

 2) For secondary shared interrupts nothing notifies the new thread to
    change its affinity.

 3) Interrupts which have the IRQ_NO_BALANCE flag set are not moving
    the thread either.

Fix this by setting the thread affinity flag right on thread creation
time. This ensures that under all circumstances the thread moves to
the right place. Requires a check in irq_thread_check_affinity for an
existing affinity mask (CONFIG_CPU_MASK_OFFSTACK=y)

Reported-and-tested-by: Sankara Muthukrishnan <sankara.m@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1209041738200.2754@ionos
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/irq/manage.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ static void
 irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t mask;
+	bool valid = true;
 
 	if (!test_and_clear_bit(IRQTF_AFFINITY, &action->thread_flags))
 		return;
@@ -712,10 +713,18 @@ irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_des
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
-	cpumask_copy(mask, desc->irq_data.affinity);
+	/*
+	 * This code is triggered unconditionally. Check the affinity
+	 * mask pointer. For CPU_MASK_OFFSTACK=n this is optimized out.
+	 */
+	if (desc->irq_data.affinity)
+		cpumask_copy(mask, desc->irq_data.affinity);
+	else
+		valid = false;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
 
-	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, mask);
+	if (valid)
+		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, mask);
 	free_cpumask_var(mask);
 }
 #else
@@ -925,6 +934,16 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
 		 */
 		get_task_struct(t);
 		new->thread = t;
+		/*
+		 * Tell the thread to set its affinity. This is
+		 * important for shared interrupt handlers as we do
+		 * not invoke setup_affinity() for the secondary
+		 * handlers as everything is already set up. Even for
+		 * interrupts marked with IRQF_NO_BALANCE this is
+		 * correct as we want the thread to move to the cpu(s)
+		 * on which the requesting code placed the interrupt.
+		 */
+		set_bit(IRQTF_AFFINITY, &new->thread_flags);
 	}
 
 	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/