linux-kernel - [ 001/123] net: fix a race in gro_cell

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130109201458.583751331@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  9 Jan 2013 12:34:00 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 001/123] net: fix a race in gro_cell_poll()

3.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit f8e8f97c11d5ff3cc47d85b97c7c35e443dcf490 ]

Dmitry Kravkov reported packet drops for GRE packets since GRO support
was added.

There is a race in gro_cell_poll() because we call napi_complete()
without any synchronization with a concurrent gro_cells_receive()

Once bug was triggered, we queued packets but did not schedule NAPI
poll.

We can fix this issue using the spinlock protected the napi_skbs queue,
as we have to hold it to perform skb dequeue anyway.

As we open-code skb_dequeue(), we no longer need to mask IRQS, as both
producer and consumer run under BH context.

Bug added in commit c9e6bc644e (net: add gro_cells infrastructure)

Reported-by: Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/net/gro_cells.h |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/gro_cells.h
+++ b/include/net/gro_cells.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct gro_cells {
 
 static inline void gro_cells_receive(struct gro_cells *gcells, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct gro_cell *cell = gcells->cells;
 	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
 
@@ -35,32 +34,37 @@ static inline void gro_cells_receive(str
 		return;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&cell->napi_skbs.lock, flags);
+	/* We run in BH context */
+	spin_lock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 
 	__skb_queue_tail(&cell->napi_skbs, skb);
 	if (skb_queue_len(&cell->napi_skbs) == 1)
 		napi_schedule(&cell->napi);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cell->napi_skbs.lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 }
 
+/* called unser BH context */
 static inline int gro_cell_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 {
 	struct gro_cell *cell = container_of(napi, struct gro_cell, napi);
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	int work_done = 0;
 
+	spin_lock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 	while (work_done < budget) {
-		skb = skb_dequeue(&cell->napi_skbs);
+		skb = __skb_dequeue(&cell->napi_skbs);
 		if (!skb)
 			break;
-
+		spin_unlock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 		napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
 		work_done++;
+		spin_lock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 	}
 
 	if (work_done < budget)
 		napi_complete(napi);
+	spin_unlock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 	return work_done;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/