lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo473rZOBERaMJV74rfGZXSuBdiPtX=mXmcLmO=CRB4P_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:16:59 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Alternative][PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in
 advance, v2

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
> acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
> "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
> the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
> (to put it lightly).
>
> This is how it works, roughly:
>
>   1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
>      creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
>      object to acpi_pci_root_add().
>
>   2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
>      populates its "device" field with its argument's address
>      (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
>
>   3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
>      to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
>      passed to pci_create_root_bus().
>
>   4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
>      and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
>
>   5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
>      acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
>
> So far, so good.  Now it starts to be "interesting".
>
>   6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
>      the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
>      acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
>      given device object.
>
>   7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
>      device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
>      root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
>
>   8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
>      root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
>      and bus numbers.  Its handle is then used to initialize the
>      ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
>      acpi_bind_one().  However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
>      started with in step 1.
>
> Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
> thanks to commit f3fd0c8 (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
> initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
> ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
>
> Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
> defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
> interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
> that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
> passed to device_register().  Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
> implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
> acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
> aren't necessary any more.
>
> Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
> bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Looks good to me!

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

> ---
>
> Well, I guess it's time to resend this one before everybody forgets it. :-)
>
> Bjorn, Yinghai,
>
> For arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h is used the iommu convention and called the
> new pointer "acpi".
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/pci/pci.c        |    8 ++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h |    3 +++
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c        |    9 +++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c    |   18 ------------------
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c     |   19 -------------------
>  drivers/pci/probe.c        |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h    |    1 -
>  include/linux/pci.h        |    2 ++
>  8 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/probe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1632,6 +1632,18 @@ unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct p
>         return max;
>  }
>
> +/**
> + * pcibios_root_bridge_prepare - Platform-specific host bridge setup.
> + * @bridge: Host bridge to set up.
> + *
> + * Default empty implementation.  Replace with an architecture-specific setup
> + * routine, if necessary.
> + */
> +int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                 struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
>  {
> @@ -1665,6 +1677,10 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(stru
>         bridge->dev.parent = parent;
>         bridge->dev.release = pci_release_bus_bridge_dev;
>         dev_set_name(&bridge->dev, "pci%04x:%02x", pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> +       error = pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(bridge);
> +       if (error)
> +               goto bridge_dev_reg_err;
> +
>         error = device_register(&bridge->dev);
>         if (error)
>                 goto bridge_dev_reg_err;
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct
>                      void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *),
>                      void *release_data);
>
> +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge);
> +
>  /*
>   * The first PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_NUM PCI bus resources (those that correspond
>   * to P2P or CardBus bridge windows) go in a table.  Additional ones (for
> Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struc
>         sd = &info->sd;
>         sd->domain = domain;
>         sd->node = node;
> +       sd->acpi = device->handle;
>         /*
>          * Maybe the desired pci bus has been already scanned. In such case
>          * it is unnecessary to scan the pci bus with the given domain,busnum.
> @@ -592,6 +593,14 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struc
>         return bus;
>  }
>
> +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> +       struct pci_sysdata *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata;
> +
> +       ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->acpi);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>  {
>         struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> Index: linux-pm/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
> @@ -393,6 +393,14 @@ out1:
>         return NULL;
>  }
>
> +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> +       struct pci_controller *controller = bridge->bus->sysdata;
> +
> +       ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&bridge->dev, controller->acpi_handle);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int is_valid_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int idx)
>  {
>         unsigned int i, type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -302,24 +302,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_find_device(struct d
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static int acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle)
> -{
> -       int num;
> -       unsigned int seg, bus;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * The string should be the same as root bridge's name
> -        * Please look at 'pci_scan_bus_parented'
> -        */
> -       num = sscanf(dev_name(dev), "pci%04x:%02x", &seg, &bus);
> -       if (num != 2)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -       *handle = acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(seg, bus);
> -       if (!*handle)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void pci_acpi_setup(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> @@ -376,7 +358,6 @@ static void pci_acpi_cleanup(struct devi
>  static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
>         .bus = &pci_bus_type,
>         .find_device = acpi_pci_find_device,
> -       .find_bridge = acpi_pci_find_root_bridge,
>         .setup = pci_acpi_setup,
>         .cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
>  };
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -107,24 +107,6 @@ void acpi_pci_unregister_driver(struct a
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_unregister_driver);
>
> -acpi_handle acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus)
> -{
> -       struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> -       acpi_handle handle = NULL;
> -
> -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       list_for_each_entry(root, &acpi_pci_roots, node)
> -               if ((root->segment == (u16) seg) &&
> -                   (root->secondary.start == (u16) bus)) {
> -                       handle = root->device->handle;
> -                       break;
> -               }
> -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       return handle;
> -}
> -
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle);
> -
>  /**
>   * acpi_is_root_bridge - determine whether an ACPI CA node is a PCI root bridge
>   * @handle - the ACPI CA node in question.
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -441,7 +441,6 @@ struct acpi_pci_root {
>  /* helper */
>  acpi_handle acpi_get_child(acpi_handle, u64);
>  int acpi_is_root_bridge(acpi_handle);
> -acpi_handle acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(unsigned int, unsigned int);
>  struct acpi_pci_root *acpi_pci_find_root(acpi_handle handle);
>  #define DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev) ((acpi_handle)ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
>
> Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>  struct pci_sysdata {
>         int             domain;         /* PCI domain */
>         int             node;           /* NUMA node */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +       void            *acpi;          /* ACPI-specific data */
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>         void            *iommu;         /* IOMMU private data */
>  #endif
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ