lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20130109145031.210505d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:50:31 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com> Cc: rientjes@...gle.com, len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, wujianguo@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com, linfeng@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org, glommer@...allels.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:32:29 +0800 Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com> wrote: > For removing memory, we need to remove page table. But it depends > on architecture. So the patch introduce arch_remove_memory() for > removing page table. Now it only calls __remove_pages(). > > Note: __remove_pages() for some archtecuture is not implemented > (I don't know how to implement it for s390). Can this break the build for s390? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists