lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:54:23 +0800 From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> CC: <rjw@...k.pl>, <robin.randhawa@....com>, <Steve.Bannister@....com>, <Liviu.Dudau@....com>, <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, <patches@...aro.org>, <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev() On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i > know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove > second one and then add it back. With this cpufreq_add_dev() would call init() > first and then try to match if there are any managed_policies present. But the > issue you pointed out about unregistering the driver would be solved by this > patch.) Yes, just played it and it works for me. However, I would have to keep that little ugly code in my patch to save the dependency on your patch. Will send a follow-up to clean that up once your patch hits mainline. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists