[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpone-pXUjuDsP7r73mP+rzSUUb1oWiu5c+NL8R_WsYoJZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:35:35 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()
On 10 January 2013 13:24, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @Shawn: I believe your driver don't require that ugly code anymore (Though i
>> know there is a situation for that to happen, if we have two cpus, you remove
>> second one and then add it back. With this cpufreq_add_dev() would call init()
>> first and then try to match if there are any managed_policies present. But the
>> issue you pointed out about unregistering the driver would be solved by this
>> patch.)
>
> Yes, just played it and it works for me. However, I would have to keep
> that little ugly code in my patch to save the dependency on your patch.
> Will send a follow-up to clean that up once your patch hits mainline.
Another thing, can i have a tested-by from you for both my patches ? remove and
add dev?
That would help it go quicker.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists