lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:04:53 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.jf.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com> Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 01/16] dw_dmac: call .probe after we have a device in place On 9 January 2013 21:08, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote: >> >> subsys_initcall(dw_init); > Viresh, Linus > > We had this discussion sometime back. pl022 use dma and we need DMA before SPI. > So if we have pl022 as late_init and dma as device_init. If we have one more > dependency then moving dw_dmac to fs_init should help too. But arch/subsys seems > overkill here? We probably can't make spi late_init as they may be others waiting for it to be in. And so did subsys_init for dma. fs is for filesystem? then that may not be logically correct too. What's the problem you are seeing here with subsys_init? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists