linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: Add helper functions for setting up transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1301100951060.2063@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:53:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: Add helper functions for setting up transfers

> +@r1@
> +identifier fn;
> +identifier xfers;
> +@@
> +fn(...)
> +{
> +	...
> +(
> +	struct spi_transfer xfers[...];
> +|
> +	struct spi_transfer xfers[];
> +)
> +	...
> +}

Can it happen that there would be more than one spi_transfer or spi_message
variable per function?  This semantic patch will only treat the case where
there is only one, because the ... before an after the variable declaration
won't match another declaration of the same form.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/