[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EE9733.2060409@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:25:55 -0800
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
CC: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SE Linux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
On 01/09/2013 05:28 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, John Johansen wrote:
>
>>> I'd say we need to see the actual use-case for Smack and Apparmor being
>>> used together, along with at least one major distro committing to support
>>> this.
>>>
>>>
>> Ubuntu is very interested in stacking
>
> Which modules?
>
Well Yama which has now been special cased, and in the past there has been
discussion about other special case LSMs like case is proposing for module
loading. There has been interest around both selinux + apparmor and
smack + apparmor. I am not sure of all of the use cases that have lead to
such question but some of them have been around containers, with say
selinux on the host and apparmor in the container, or visa versa.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists