linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3580741.9uNSi7V1RO@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:12:55 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

Hi,

On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:28:36 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c between commit 3c449ed00759 ("PCI/ACPI: Reserve
> firmware-allocated resources for hot-added root buses") from the pci tree
> and commit 47525cda88f5 ("ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into
> acpi_pci_root_add()") from the pm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Thanks for the fixup and please carry it for now (the conflict should go away
when Bjorn pulls from my acpi-scan branch).

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/