[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130110155058.12f66e73@bob.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:50:58 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, frank@...htenheld.de
Subject: Re: regression, bisected: openpty fails from 3.7 onwards without
devpts
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:46:26 +0100
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld discovered that openpty() doesn't work anymore when
> /dev/pts is not present.
>
> We bisected this down to
>
> commit bbb63c514a3464342967237a51a21ea8f61ab951
> Author: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
> Subject: drivers:tty:fix up ENOIOCTLCMD error handling
>
> The original program triggering the error was pptpd, but
> the test program below is sufficient:
> ----
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <pty.h>
> int main(void) {
> int pty_fd, tty_fd;
> if (openpty(&pty_fd, &tty_fd, NULL, NULL, NULL) != 0) {
> perror("openpty");
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> ----
> [ compile with cc -lutil pty.c -o pty ]
>
> If devpts is available or above commit reverted openpty works again.
The commit is fairly general - what we need to do here is to figure out
which specific thing trips up openpty so we can put the error on that
back as it was (or find a better way) so it still works.
Can you attach an strace of the working/failing cases without /dev/pts
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists