linux-kernel - Re: ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130110200352.GA5316@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:03:52 +0000
From:	Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending

Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> Thanks Eric, it's much appreciated. However, I'm still very much in favour
> of a partial revert as in retrospect the implementation of capture took the
> wrong approach. Could you confirm the following patch works for you?
> It's should functionally have the same effect as the first revert and
> there are only minor changes from the last revert prototype I sent you
> but there is no harm in being sure.

Thanks, I was just about to report back on the last partial revert
being successful :)  Will start testing this one, now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/