linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130110.143932.748033133604759561.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:39:32 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Cc:	r.kuntz@...lavors.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...lax.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in
 addrconf_get_prefix_route

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:00:33 +0900

> Romain KUNTZ wrote:
>> From e7ece201c35615c44a3cfdc10ee28ad5a5878f41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
>> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:02:26 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route
>> 
>> The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make
>> much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that
>> must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done
>> against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
 ...
> Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/