linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead asynchronously

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130110040546.GA23797@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:05:46 +0000
From:	Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To:	Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead asynchronously

Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-25 at 02:22 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> 
> Please add changelog.

Changes since v1:

* separate unbound workqueue for high-priority tasks

* account for inflight readahead to avoid denial-of-service

* limit concurrency for non-high-priority tasks (1 per CPU, same as aio)

* take IO priority of requesting process into account when in workqueue.

* process queued readahead in 2M chunks to help ensure fairness between
  multiple requests with few CPUs/workqueues.  Idle tasks get smaller
  256K chunks.

* stops readahead for idle tasks on read congestion

Will try to benchmark with Postgres when I get the chance.

Any other (Free Software) applications that might benefit from
lower FADV_WILLNEED latency?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/