lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:56:08 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree

Hi Daniel,

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:22:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:11:50 +0100 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/07/2013 11:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > All the commits in the cpuidle tree have been included upstream before
> > > v3.6-rc1.  They were rewritten before being merged upstream and so are
> > > now causing merge conflicts in linux-next.  Could you please reset the
> > > head of your tree
> > > (git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git#cpuidle-next) to
> > > be somewhere in the tree that yours is merged into (pm or Linus').
> > 
> > Sure. I believe it is done now.
> 
> Yep, thanks.

Unfortunately, you reset your tree to be a version of the pm tree that has
now been rebased :-(  This is now causing more conflicts in linux-next.
Maybe you should reset your tree to be the same as one of Linus' -rc
releases for now.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ