[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1357888690-24012-1-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:18:10 +0900
From: Keun-O Park <kpark3469@...il.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sahara <keun-o.park@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm: fix returning wrong CALLER_ADDRx
From: sahara <keun-o.park@...driver.com>
This makes return_address return correct value for ftrace feature.
unwind_frame does not update frame->lr but frame->pc for backtrace.
And, the initialization for data.addr was missing so that wrong value
returned when unwind_frame failed.
Signed-off-by: sahara <keun-o.park@...driver.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
index 8085417..fafedd8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static int save_return_addr(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
struct return_address_data *data = d;
if (!data->level) {
- data->addr = (void *)frame->lr;
+ data->addr = (void *)frame->pc;
return 1;
} else {
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level)
struct stackframe frame;
register unsigned long current_sp asm ("sp");
- data.level = level + 1;
+ data.level = level + 2;
+ data.addr = NULL;
frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
frame.sp = current_sp;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists