linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000
From:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
> other tree that does not rebase).  Its OK to test by doing a merge with
> linux-next ...

Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on
things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the
individual trees I needed first?

Cheers
James


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)