lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EFF244.30001@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:06:44 +0200
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <kishon@...com>,
	USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] usb: ehci-omap: Instantiate PHY devices if required

On 01/11/2013 12:59 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 10:48 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>> If the OMAP's Host controller is in PHY mode then we instantiate
>>> a platform device for the PHY (one for each port in PHY mode) and
>>> hold a reference to it so that we can use the usb_phy API, e.g.
>>> while suspend/resume.
>>>
>>> The platform data for the PHY must be supplied in the newly added
>>> .phy_config parameter in struct usbhs_omap_platform_data.
>>>
>>> The end goal is to move the PHY's reset and power handling code
>>> out of the ehci-omap driver and into the phy driver.
>>
>> As mentioned in another thread, I would prefer to have these changes to 
>> ehci-omap.c made after the driver is converted to the new "ehci-hcd is 
>> a library" scheme.  The patch below does the conversion; it is meant to 
>> apply on top of the similar patch for ehci-mxc posted recently on the 
>> linux-usb mailing list.
>>
>> After this conversion, the omap_ehci_hcd private data structure doesn't 
>> have to be allocated specifically.  It can be handled in the same way 
>> as the private data structure in the ehci-mxc patch.
>>
>> I haven't even tried to compile this.  Please let me know how it works.
>>
> 
> Alan,
> 
> Thanks for the patch. I've pasted the version that builds and works and
> put you as the Author of the patch, hope it is fine.
> 
> I could not find the equivalent ehci-mxc implementation though. Any
> pointers to that? Thanks.

OK I found it. Previously I was searching in the archives :P.

cheers,
-roger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ