lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EFFDAA.6060204@synopsys.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:25:22 +0530
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing

On Friday 11 January 2013 05:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> * DT binding for arc-uart
>> * With alll the bits in place we can now use DT probing.
>>
>> Note that there's a bit of kludge right now because earlyprintk portion
>> of driver can't use the DT infrastrcuture to get resoures/plat_data.
>> This requires some infrastructre changes to of_flat_ framework
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
>> Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Quick question about the name though: is this UART only used
> on ARC, or is it something that synopsys licenses to other
> parties as well? If the latter is true, we might want to 
> add a more generic "compatible" value for those that use
> it on another architecture.

It's not licensed as standalone IP - since its not a standard 8250. It is only
(but actively) used on the internal FPGA flows from ARC days.

Thx,
Vineet

> 	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists