[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357909236.4146.29.camel@falcor>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:00:36 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwalsh@...hat.com,
dmalcolm@...hat.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, segoon@...nwall.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Friendlier EPERM - Request for input
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:34 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> Friendlier/more complete error messages would eliminate an awful lot of
> digging around trying to figure *what* the problem is, preparatory to
> discerning *where* the problem is and *how* to fix it.
Agreed, add to the mix of existing issues, with the upstreaming of
IMA-appraisal, failure when enforcing integrity.
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists