linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: PL011: Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130111161828.GD23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:18:28 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>
Cc:	'Alan Cox' <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: PL011: Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:13:31PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
> In DMA support, Received data is not triggered until the DMA buffer is filled.
> In order to actually use Rx DMA, We would like to suggest the use of the timer
> for polling DMA buffer. It makes possible character-level trigger.
> In our test, no data loss occurred at high-baudrate as compared with interrupt
> driven (We tested with 3Mbps). We know it will be because of the increased Rx
> buffer rather than DMA effect. but,It is very useful for high speed uart device.
> We changes:
> 
> - CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_DMAPOLL is added to select this feature.
> 
> - add timer and last_residue for polling. Every polling, timer handler checks
>   the residue in the dma buffer and transfer data to the tty. Also, last_residue
>   is updated for the next polling.
> 
> - We use consistent DMA mappings instead of streaming DMA mappings to avoid from
>   the frequent cache operation.
> 
> - pl011_dma_rx_chars is modified. the pending size is recalculated because data
>   can be taken by polling.
> 
> - add module parameter for adjusting polling interval.

Here's the question: what is the effect of having to poll every tick on
the overall system?

What I'm getting at is: what is the cost of that polling with DMA enabled
over not having DMA on the receive side at all?  What is the trade-off
vs baud rate?  Should we scale the polling interval according to baud
rate?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/