lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1357870727.27446.2988.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:18:47 -0800 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2/rc3 write() blocked on CLOSE_WAIT TCP socket From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 18:01 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Hmm, it might be commit c3ae62af8e755ea68380fb5ce682e60079a4c388 > tcp: should drop incoming frames without ACK flag set > > It seems RST should be allowed to not have ACK set. > > I'll send a fix, thanks ! Yes, thats definitely the problem, sorry for that. [PATCH] tcp: accept RST without ACK flag commit c3ae62af8e755 (tcp: should drop incoming frames without ACK flag set) added a regression on the handling of RST messages. RST should be allowed to come even without ACK bit set. We validate the RST by checking the exact sequence, as requested by RFC 793 and 5961 3.2, in tcp_validate_incoming() Reported-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 38e1184..0905997 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -5541,7 +5541,7 @@ slow_path: if (len < (th->doff << 2) || tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb)) goto csum_error; - if (!th->ack) + if (!th->ack && !th->rst) goto discard; /* @@ -5986,7 +5986,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, goto discard; } - if (!th->ack) + if (!th->ack && !th->rst) goto discard; if (!tcp_validate_incoming(sk, skb, th, 0)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists