[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130111160813.GA14503@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:08:13 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [GIT PULL rcu/urgent] Fixes for RCU regressions in 3.8
Hello, Ingo,
Paul Gortmaker found some problems with no-CBs-CPU support in 3.8
mainline, and kindly supplied fixes. The first problem is soft-lockup
complaints that can occur on systems running with no-CBs CPUs that have
long periods of time where RCU is completely idle, which can happen on
some embedded systems. The second problem is a documentation error
for the "rcutree.rcu_nocb_poll" boot parameter. In this case, Paul Gortmaker
(rightly) noted that the need for "rcutree." was inconsistent with the
"rcu_nocbs=<cpumap>" boot parameter. The fix therefore to make the boot
parameter named "rcu_nocb_poll".
These problems only affect kernels built with the new CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
kernel parameter, but still should be fixed.
These fixes are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent
Thanx, Paul
------------------>
Paul Gortmaker (2):
rcu: Prevent soft-lockup complaints about no-CBs CPUs
rcu: Make rcu_nocb_poll an early_param instead of module_param
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 13 ++++++++++---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists