[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVts6aTaRFM3aKWj46RCRiheM5gS55h=LVveaGXk_kR8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:52:02 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not
enough ram for it
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:07:10PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> I'm the frontline maintainer of swiotlb and related stuff so if you want to follow
> the proper protocol you should wait until I give you my Ack.
Sure.
>
> I need to check this patch out and then also test-run them on IA64, AMD-VI, Calgary-X
> GART and Intel VT-d to make a sanity test.
that will be great, and please check attached two patches, or you want
to me update
for-x86-boot branch and you test that instead?
but if you want to check memmap=4095M$1M, then will need to test on
newer branch.
>
> However, this particular patch can go outside the mega-patchset you have. So you
> could post the mega-patchset to hpa without this being in it and just mention
> that there is this extra one that Konrad is handling.
Just want to put them together, so in case backporting guys could find
them easier.
Thanks
Yinghai
Download attachment "alloc_low_page_nopanic.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (2534 bytes)
Download attachment "swiotlb.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (6465 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists