[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201301112012.45981.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:12:45 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux SPI Devel List
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX
On Friday 11 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
> We have tightly coupled the link-time dependency for
> omap_dma_filter_fn by going down the path of using
> dma_request_slave_channel_compat() as Tony suggested to avoid extra
> ifdefry.
>
> That dependency will go away naturally if all the "legacy" OMAP platforms
> were required to only boot from DT...just as a newly added SoCs are.
>
> Are you suggesting unwinding the _compat() approach?
No, I was thinking we could define omap_dma_filter_fn to NULL
for the DT-only case.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists