[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F07588.90902@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:26:48 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"maxim.uvarov@...cle.com" <maxim.uvarov@...cle.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] xen: Initial kexec/kdump implementation
>
> And there is nothing fancy to be done for EFI and SecureBoot? Or is
> that something that the kernel has to handle on its own (so somehow
> passing some certificates to somewhere).
>
For EFI, no... other than passing the EFI parameters, which apparently
is *not* currently done (David Woodhouse is working on it.) Secure boot
is still a work in progress.
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists