[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F09FCB.70809@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:27:07 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 3/3] ARM: tegra: dts: seaboard: enable keyboard
On 01/11/2013 04:24 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:09:59PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/11/2013 06:33 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> kbc->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>> if (IS_ERR(kbc->clk)) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get keyboard clock\n");
>>> err = PTR_ERR(kbc->clk);
>>> goto err_iounmap;
>>> }
>>
>> Should that check be if (!kbc-clk) instead? Or does the common clock
>> framework require if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(kbc->clk)); hopefully not since
>> IS_ERR_OR_NULL shouldn't be used any more.
>
> /**
> * clk_get - lookup and obtain a reference to a clock producer.
> * @dev: device for clock "consumer"
> * @id: clock consumer ID
> *
> * Returns a struct clk corresponding to the clock producer, or
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> * valid IS_ERR() condition containing errno. ...
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Or, put another way:
>
> If (!IS_ERR(clk))
> The_Clock_Is_Valid();
> Else
> The_Clock_Is_Invalid();
> The_Error = PTR_ERR(clk);
OK, but that doesn't appear to be what happened in practice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists