[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EF9BA4.1070108@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:27:08 +0530
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de,
pjt@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/22] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up
On 01/05/2013 02:07 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> It is impossible to miss a task allowed cpu in a eligible group.
>
> And since find_idlest_group only return a different group which
> excludes old cpu, it's also imporissible to find a new cpu same as old
> cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 5eea870..6d3a95d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3378,11 +3378,6 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
> }
>
> new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(group, p, cpu);
> - if (new_cpu == -1 || new_cpu == cpu) {
> - /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of cpu */
> - sd = sd->child;
> - continue;
> - }
>
> /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of new_cpu */
> cpu = new_cpu;
>
Reviewed-by:Preeti U Murthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists