[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130110.211237.653335807366477404.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:12:37 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: stefanha@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-rc] tuntap: refuse to re-attach to different
tun_struct
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:29:20 +0800
> On 01/11/2013 06:39 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:59:48 +0100
>>
>>> Multiqueue tun devices support detaching a tun_file from its tun_struct
>>> and re-attaching at a later point in time. This allows users to disable
>>> a specific queue temporarily.
>>>
>>> ioctl(TUNSETIFF) allows the user to specify the network interface to
>>> attach by name. This means the user can attempt to attach to interface
>>> "B" after detaching from interface "A".
>>>
>>> The driver is not designed to support this so check we are re-attaching
>>> to the right tun_struct. Failure to do so may lead to oops.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
>> Applied.
> Hi David:
>
> Any chance that I can have a respin on this patch, there's still a bug
> after this patch. Or I just can send a patch on top?
If I've applied it, there is no reverting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists