lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130112123055.GX19691@intel.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 04:30:55 -0800 From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.jf.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com> Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 01/16] dw_dmac: call .probe after we have a device in place On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:04:53PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 January 2013 21:08, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote: > >> >> subsys_initcall(dw_init); > > Viresh, Linus > > > > We had this discussion sometime back. pl022 use dma and we need DMA before SPI. > > So if we have pl022 as late_init and dma as device_init. If we have one more > > dependency then moving dw_dmac to fs_init should help too. But arch/subsys seems > > overkill here? > > We probably can't make spi late_init as they may be others waiting for > it to be in. And > so did subsys_init for dma. fs is for filesystem? then that may not be > logically correct too. well subsys_init doesnt seem to be logical for dma driver too! -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists