linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/22] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1358153743.8818.9.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:55:43 +0800
From:	li guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>
Cc:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
	"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	"efault@....de" <efault@....de>,
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/22] sched: remove domain iterations in
 fork/exec/wake

在 2013-01-11五的 10:07 +0000，Morten Rasmussen写道：
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:46:31AM +0000, Alex Shi wrote:
> > On 01/10/2013 02:21 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > >>  		new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(group, p, cpu);
> > >> > -
> > >> > -		/* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of new_cpu */
> > >> > -		cpu = new_cpu;
> > >> > -		weight = sd->span_weight;
> > >> > -		sd = NULL;
> > >> > -		for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
> > >> > -			if (weight <= tmp->span_weight)
> > >> > -				break;
> > >> > -			if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
> > >> > -				sd = tmp;
> > >> > -		}
> > >> > -		/* while loop will break here if sd == NULL */
> > > I agree that this should be a major optimization. I just can't figure
> > > out why the existing recursive search for an idle cpu switches to the
> > > new cpu near the end and then starts a search for an idle cpu in the new
> > > cpu's domain. Is this to handle some exotic sched domain configurations?
> > > If so, they probably wouldn't work with your optimizations.
> > 
> > I did not find odd configuration that asking for old logical.
> > 
> > According to Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.txt, Maybe never.
> > "A domain's span MUST be a superset of it child's span (this restriction
> > could be relaxed if the need arises), and a base domain for CPU i MUST
> > span at least i."  etc. etc.
> 
> The reason for my suspicion is the SD_OVERLAP flag, which has something
> to do overlapping sched domains. I haven't looked into what it does or
> how it works. I'm just wondering if this optimization will affect the
> use of that flag.

seems it did, SD_OVERLAP will not work after this change,
though this flag is maybe scarcely used.
because, this optimization assume all sched-domains span 
is super-set over child domain.
isn't it? Alex.

> 
> Morten
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thanks Alex
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
regards!
li guang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/