[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878v7w14dn.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:49:08 +0100
From: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
Lijo Antony <lijo.kernel@...il.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: i915_hangcheck_hung problem with 3.8-rc2+ (Linus's latest tree)
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>> bug still kicking even w/ (drm/i915: Revert shrinker changes from "Track
>>>> unbound pages")
>>>
>>> Could be a different bug, can you please attach the error_state somewhere?
>>
>> yep, i915_error_state is attached. btw, I'm going to bisect kernel, so
>> hopefully I will bring some commit.
>
> Different bug, on a quick lock this could be a dupe of
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52311
ok
> Chris should know the details.
thanks, bisection leads me to commit d7d4eed ("drm/i915: Allow
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER to submit privileged batchbuffers). It's not
possible to simply revert/test commit and I have no idea how i915 works.
Chris any ideas?
--
Nikola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists