linux-kernel - watchdog code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1358176319.1621.11.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:41:59 +0530
From:	anish kumar <anish198519851985@...il.com>
To:	johlstei@...eaurora.org
Cc:	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: watchdog code

>From your comments in this thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/25/723 

>The msm watchdog driver is present in kernel only. It does not use the
>built-in Linux watchdog api. This is because the primary function of
>our watchdog is detecting bus lockups and interrupts being turned off
Doesn't linux original implementation(kernel/watchdog.c) already cover
this?If not then how does this implementation detect it i.e. bus lockup
and interrupt turned off for long time?
Does this piece of code can co-exist with the soft/hard lockup detection
in the core kernel?
>for long periods of time. We wanted this functionality to be present
>regardless of the userspace the kernel is running beneath. Userspace is
>free to have its own watchdog implemented in software.
what does this mean, can you elaborate?

>Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>
In my personal opinion, we should always acknowledge the code from which
this code is inspired :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/