[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1301141302380.1782-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:04:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: USB device cannot be reconnected and khubd "blocked for more
than 120 seconds"
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > - from view of driver, introducing async_synchronize_full() after
> > do_one_initcall() inside do_init_module() is like a sync probe
> > for drivers built as module, and cause this kind of deadlock easily.
> >
> > So could we revert the commit and fix the previous problems just
> > case by case? or other better fix?
>
> There's no way in hell we take a "fix things one by one" approach.
> It's not going to work. And your suggestion seems to not do async
> discovery of devices in general, which is a *much* worse fix than
> anything else. It's just crazy.
>
> But there are other approaches we might take. We might move the call to
>
> async_synchronize_full();
>
> to other places. For example, maybe we're better off doing it at
> block/char device open instead?
How about skipping that call if the current thread is one of the async
helpers? Is it possible to detect when that happens?
Or maybe such a check should go inside async_synchronize_full() itself.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists