lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130114221551.GA30020@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:15:51 +0100
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	swarren@...dia.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] input: keyboard: tegra: use devm_* for resource
 allocation

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:16:44AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:49:59PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:48AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:27:39PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:06:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > > @@ -735,25 +738,16 @@ static int tegra_kbc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > > > >  	spin_lock_init(&kbc->lock);
> > > > > > > > >  	setup_timer(&kbc->timer, tegra_kbc_keypress_timer, (unsigned long)kbc);
> > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > > -	res = request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res), pdev->name);
> > > > > > > > > -	if (!res) {
> > > > > > > > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request I/O memory\n");
> > > > > > > > > -		err = -EBUSY;
> > > > > > > > > -		goto err_free_mem;
> > > > > > > > > -	}
> > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > -	kbc->mmio = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> > > > > > > > > +	kbc->mmio = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> > > > > > > > >  	if (!kbc->mmio) {
> > > > > > > > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remap I/O memory\n");
> > > > > > > > > -		err = -ENXIO;
> > > > > > > > > -		goto err_free_mem_region;
> > > > > > > > > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot request memregion/iomap address\n");
> > > > > > > > > +		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Erm, no, -EBUSY please.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > EADDRNOTAVAIL is the canonical error for devm_request_and_ioremap()
> > > > > > > failure. The kerneldoc comment in lib/devres.c even gives a short
> > > > > > > example that uses this error code.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I am sorry, but I do not consider a function that was added a little
> > > > > > over a year ago as a canon. If you look at the uses of EADDRNOTAVAIL it
> > > > > > is used predominantly in networking code to indicate that attempted
> > > > > > _network_ address is not available.
> > > > > 
> > > > > EBUSY might be misleading, though. devm_request_and_ioremap() can fail
> > > > > in both the request_mem_region() and ioremap() calls. Furthermore it'd
> > > > > be good to settle on a consistent error-code instead of doing it
> > > > > differently depending on subsystem and/or driver. Currently the various
> > > > > error codes used are:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	EBUSY, EADDRNOTAVAIL, ENXIO, ENOMEM, ENODEV, ENOENT, EINVAL,
> > > > > 	EIO, EFAULT, EADDRINUSE
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also if we can settle on one error code we should follow up with a patch
> > > > > to make it consistent across the tree and also update that kerneldoc
> > > > > comment. I volunteer to do that if nobody else steps up. I'm also Cc'ing
> > > > > Wolfram (the original author), maybe he has some thoughts on this.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > If you going to change all drivers make devm_request_and_ioremap()
> > > > return ERR_PTR()-encoded errors and then we can differentiate what
> > > > part of it failed.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, that thought also crossed my mind. I'll give other people some
> > > time to comment before hurling myself into preparing patches.
> > 
> > I've prepared a patch that changes devm_request_and_ioremap() to return
> > ERR_PTR()-encoded errors and adjusts all callers. As you can imagine it
> > is a bit on the huge side. scripts/get_maintainer.pl lists 156 people
> > and mailing lists. I've gone through the list, and as far as I can tell
> > everyone on that list is actually affected by the patch, so there's not
> > much potential for tuning it down.
> > 
> > There is also the issue of whose tree this should go into. Unfortunately
> > the patch can't be broken down into smaller chunks because it changes
> > how the devm_request_and_ioremap() function's return value is handled in
> > an incompatible way, so it won't be possible to gradually phase this in.
> > Furthermore I can imagine that until the end of the release cycle new
> > code may be added on which the same transformations need to be done. I
> > have a semantic patch to do the bulk of the work, but quite a bit of
> > coordination will be required.
> > 
> > I'm adding Arnd and Greg on Cc, maybe they can advise on how best to
> > handle this kind of patch.
> 
> You should provide a "wrapper" function that does the correct return
> value, convert drivers over to it, and then, when everyone is changed,
> drop the old call.  To change 156 different drivers all at once, in a
> way that is not detectable by the compiler breaking the build, is not a
> good thing to do at all.
> 
> By doing it in this manner, it will take longer, but you can push the
> patches through the different maintainer's trees.  If they are slow,
> I'll be glad to take the remaining patches in my driver-core tree to do
> the final bits.

It certainly sounds like a less complicated way to do it. But it also
involves adding a function with a made up name and drop a function with
a perfectly good name instead. I wouldn't even know what name to choose
for the new API.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ