linux-kernel - [ 035/171] jffs2: hold erase_completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130115224315.946144505@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:43:20 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [ 035/171] jffs2: hold erase_completion_lock on exit

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>

commit 2cbba75a56ea78e6876b4e2547a882f10b3fe72b upstream.

Users of jffs2_do_reserve_space() expect they still held
erase_completion_lock after call to it. But there is a path
where jffs2_do_reserve_space() leaves erase_completion_lock unlocked.
The patch fixes it.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
@@ -375,14 +375,16 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct
 			spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
 
 			ret = jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs(c, jeb, 1);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
+
 			/* Just lock it again and continue. Nothing much can change because
 			   we hold c->alloc_sem anyway. In fact, it's not entirely clear why
 			   we hold c->erase_completion_lock in the majority of this function...
 			   but that's a question for another (more caffeine-rich) day. */
 			spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
 
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+
 			waste = jeb->free_size;
 			jffs2_link_node_ref(c, jeb,
 					    (jeb->offset + c->sector_size - waste) | REF_OBSOLETE,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/