[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxnCn13PigcWjrcnSV9RAz5gSX-VtQk9J8HEbQco7jbbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:25:40 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hardlockup: detect hard lockups without NMIs using
secondary cpus
2013/1/15 Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>> I believe this is pretty much what the RCU stall detector does
>> already: checks for other CPUs being responsive. The only difference
>> is on how it checks that. For RCU it's about checking for CPUs
>> reporting quiescent states when requested to do so. In your case it's
>> about ensuring the hrtimer interrupt is well handled.
>>
>> One thing you can do is to enqueue an RCU callback (cal_rcu()) every
>> minute so you can force other CPUs to report quiescent states
>> periodically and thus check for lockups.
>
> That's a good point, I'll take a look at using that. A minute is too
> long, some SoCs have maximum HW watchdog periods of under 30 seconds,
> but a call_rcu every 10-20 seconds might be sufficient.
Sure. And you can tune CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT accordingly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists