[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F4A4FC.3070904@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:38:20 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim()
2013/01/15 6:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series of patches changes the way acpi_bus_trim() works so that,
> eventually, it walks the namespace twice detaching (ACPI) drivers from
> device nodes being removed in the first pass and removing the device
> nodes in the second pass.
>
> The first two patches are just cleanups removing unused stuff:
>
> [1/5] Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device (unrelated to the rest).
> [2/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister().
>
> The next three patches actually rework acpi_bus_trim() in three steps:
>
> [3/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() (all callers pass 1 in there
> anyway.
> [4/5] Reimplement acpi_bus_trim() using acpi_walk_namespace().
> [3/5] Make acpi_bus_trim() carry out two passes as described above.
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> I'm aware of the fact that this will conflict with the patches that Yinghai
> posted a few days ago, but in my opinion the changes here are prerequisite for
> the Yinghai's patchset.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists