[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F53979.4050509@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:41:53 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: "Kumar, Anil" <anilkumar.v@...com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
"hs@...x.de" <hs@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] ARM: davinci: da850: add NAND driver entries
On 1/15/2013 4:06 PM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 17:49:13, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> On 1/10/2013 1:07 PM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 18:17:46, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>>
>>> I do not think that it is good idea to move NAND pin mux information
>>> into da850.dtsi because this information is evm specific.
>>> if we will use this approach then we must use the same approach for
>>> other modules also as ASoC etc.
>>
>> Why do you consider this EVM specific. IOW, which pins do you see
>> changing on another board? BTW, if there are additional pins needed than
>> what are listed, we can always add more pinux entries in the .dts files.
>> The pins present in dtsi file should the base case.
>
> Ok, we can use this approach for DaVinci as its SoC modules do not
> have multiple pin configuration option. I will do the changes in
> next patch series.
You could do this even if this was the case by defining multiple pin groups.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists