[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130115120012.GA23333@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:00:12 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
"john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] clockevents: Add generic timer broadcast receiver
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:24:53AM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:17:26PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > I thought this previously also [1], but I couldn't find any path such that a
> > > > tick_cpu_device would have an evtdev without an event_handler. We always set the
> > > > handler before setting evtdev, and alway wipe evtdev before wiping the handler.
> > > >
> > > > Have I missed something?
> > >
> > > That's an x86 specific issue. Though we could try and make that
> > > functionality completely generic.
> >
> > Just to check: is the evt->event_handler check necessary?
>
> For x86 yes. See the comment.
Ah, sorry. I misunderstood on my initial reading.
I've posted a version with the evt->event_handler check restored, and the
tick_receive_broadcast stub removed when !CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/14/276
The generic clockevents patches (based on v3.8-rc3) can also be found at
git://linux-arm.org/linux-mr.git tags/timer-broadcast-v3-core
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists