[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F4AE6E.6080103@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:18:38 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To: Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c: fix resource leakage
On 01/14/2013 10:14 AM, Cong Ding wrote:
> the file should be closed if it goes to error.
>
What tool are you using to generate all these patches?
> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c
> index 958a641..e29154f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> if (fread(&olen, sizeof(olen), 1, f) != 1) {
> perror(argv[1]);
> + fclose(f);
The next line is a return from main(). All FILEs will be automatically
closed by the C library, so your change is redundant.
The x86 maintainers can do what ever they want with it. But to me, it
seems like unnecessary code churn.
David Daney
> return 1;
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists