linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 03/11] cgroup, sched: let cpu serve the same files as cpuacct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:52:01 -0800
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...il.com>
CC:	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/11] cgroup, sched: let cpu serve the same files
 as cpuacct

On 01/15/2013 02:19 AM, Sha Zhengju wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
>> On 01/14/2013 12:34 AM, Sha Zhengju wrote:
>>>> +               struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat = this_cpu_ptr(ca->cpustat);
>>>>> +
>>>>>                 kcpustat = this_cpu_ptr(ca->cpustat);
>>> Is this reassignment unnecessary?
>>>
>>>
>> No.
>>
> 
> No?  No!
> 
I misread your question as "is this reassignment necessary".
For which the answer is no: there is no reason to do it, it is just a
bad chunk.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/