[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130115191613.GD7211@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:16:14 +0100
From: Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netfilter@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter@...r.kernel.org>,
"coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: netfilter/xt_CT.c: fix uninitialized variable
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:06:51PM +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:58 +0100, Cong Ding wrote:
> > If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES is not defined, the variable ret might be
> > uninitialized when it goes to err1 through line 125 and 263 respectively.
> > So I change these goto err1 to return -EINVAL directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/xt_CT.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c b/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c
> > index 2a08430..941f600 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c
> > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static int xt_ct_tg_check_v0(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES
> > if (info->zone)
> > - goto err1;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > #endif
> >
> > ret = nf_ct_l3proto_try_module_get(par->family);
> > @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int xt_ct_tg_check_v1(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES
> > if (info->zone)
> > - goto err1;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > #endif
>
> In dropping both goto's, you left the err1 label unused. Wouldn't just
> initializing ret to -EINVAL be easier and cleaner? Then you wouldn't be
> messing with the flow of the function.
The label err1 are also used in line 130 and 298. I change it to "return
-EINVAL" rather than initialize ret to -EINVAL is to keep it the same as line
115 and 253. Otherwise, we should change line 115 and 253 to be goto err1,
too?
- cong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists