linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rtc: Skip the suspend/resume handling if persistent clock exist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50F5B2B8.4040506@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:49:12 -0800
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rtc: Skip the suspend/resume handling if persistent
 clock exist

On 01/15/2013 08:09 AM, Feng Tang wrote:
> All the RTC suspend and resume functions are to compensate the
> sleep time, but this is already done in timekeeping.c if persistent
> clock exist.
>

Applied. Thanks!
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/