[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2zk0ayw65.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:26:58 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: John McCorquodale <mcq@...kgeek.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Transparent Hugepage Nit
John McCorquodale <mcq@...kgeek.org> writes:
> Suppose a hugepage-aligned mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS) mapping has been madvise()d
> HUGEPAGE. If a subeqeuent call to mremap() grows the mapping and has to
> move the mapping, the hugepage-alignment is not preserved in the choice of
> new address (in 3.7.2).
>
> I can workaround this by doing a 1-hugepage-oversized remap to find a new
> aligned address and then size it back down MREMAP_FIXED, but that's probably
> a lot of frags to 4k pages and back that aren't necessary.
>
> Should it not be the case that mremap(MAYMOVE) on something advised hugepage
> ALWAYS chooses a hugepage-aligned address? This would be handy when doing the
> initial allocation too: mmap, madvise, mremap (to the same size) to get
> alignment.
The hole searching currently doesn't know anything about transparent
huge pages. There were some discussions on fixing it. But it's
essentially a trade off between memory fragmentation and huge page
optimization: aggressively aligning to 2MB can lose address space
in holes.
Usually if the program uses large enough mappings and enough memory
it shouldn't be a problem.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists