linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND 1/4] sched: /proc/sched_stat fails on very very large machines.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:46:09 -0600
From:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
To:	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	johnstul@...ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] sched: /proc/sched_stat fails on very very large machines.

On systems with 4096 cores doing a cat /proc/sched_stat fails.
We are trying to push all the data into a single kmalloc buffer.
The issue is on these very large machines all the data will not fit in 4mb.

A better solution is to not us the single_open mechanism but to provide
our own seq_operations.

The output should be identical to previous version and thus not need the
version number.

CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> 
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> 
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
---
 kernel/sched/stats.c |   73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/stats.c b/kernel/sched/stats.c
index 903ffa9..33a85c9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/stats.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stats.c
@@ -21,9 +21,13 @@ static int show_schedstat(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	if (mask_str == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	seq_printf(seq, "version %d\n", SCHEDSTAT_VERSION);
-	seq_printf(seq, "timestamp %lu\n", jiffies);
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+	if (v == (void *)1) {
+		seq_printf(seq, "version %d\n", SCHEDSTAT_VERSION);
+		seq_printf(seq, "timestamp %lu\n", jiffies);
+	} else {
+
+		cpu = (unsigned long)(v - 2);
+
 		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 		struct sched_domain *sd;
@@ -72,35 +76,64 @@ static int show_schedstat(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 #endif
+		kfree(mask_str);
 	}
-	kfree(mask_str);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int schedstat_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+static void *schedstat_start(struct seq_file *file, loff_t *offset)
 {
-	unsigned int size = PAGE_SIZE * (1 + num_online_cpus() / 32);
-	char *buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	struct seq_file *m;
-	int res;
+	unsigned long n = *offset;
 
-	if (!buf)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	res = single_open(file, show_schedstat, NULL);
-	if (!res) {
-		m = file->private_data;
-		m->buf = buf;
-		m->size = size;
-	} else
-		kfree(buf);
-	return res;
+	if (n == 0)
+		return (void *) 1;
+
+	n--;
+
+	if (n > 0)
+		n = cpumask_next(n - 1, cpu_online_mask);
+	else
+		n = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
+
+	*offset = n + 1;
+
+	if (n < nr_cpu_ids)
+		return (void *)(unsigned long)(n + 2);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *schedstat_next(struct seq_file *file, void *data, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	(*offset)++;
+	return schedstat_start(file, offset);
+}
+
+static void schedstat_stop(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
+{
+}
+
+static const struct seq_operations schedstat_sops = {
+	.start = schedstat_start,
+	.next  = schedstat_next,
+	.stop  = schedstat_stop,
+	.show  = show_schedstat,
+};
+
+static int schedstat_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return seq_open(file, &schedstat_sops);
 }
 
+static int schedstat_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return 0;
+};
+
 static const struct file_operations proc_schedstat_operations = {
 	.open    = schedstat_open,
 	.read    = seq_read,
 	.llseek  = seq_lseek,
-	.release = single_release,
+	.release = schedstat_release,
 };
 
 static int __init proc_schedstat_init(void)
-- 
1.6.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/